Study of novel natural compounds as potential drugs in the treatment of acute leukemias

Introduction: Among all cancer types leukemia represents the leading cause of cancer death in man younger than 40 years. Single-target drug therapy has generally been highly ineffective in treating complex diseases such as cancer. A growing interest has been directed toward multi-target drugs able to hit multiple targets. In this context, plant products, based on their intrinsic complexity, could represent an interesting and promising approach. Aim of the research followed during my PhD was to indentify and study novel natural compounds for the treatment of acute leukemias. Two potential multi-target drugs were identified in Hemidesmus indicus and piperlongumine. Methodology/Principal Findings: A variety of cellular assays and flow cytometry were performed on different cell lines. We demonstrated that Hemidesmus modulates many components of intracellular signaling pathways involved in cell viability and proliferation and alters gene and protein expression, eventually leading to tumor cell death, mediated by a loss of mitochondrial transmembrane potential, raise of [Ca2+]i, inhibition of Mcl-1, increasing Bax/Bcl-2 ratio, and ROS formation. Moreover, we proved that the decoction causes differentiation of HL-60 and regulates angiogenesis of HUVECs in hypoxia and normoxia, by the inhibition of new vessel formation and the processes of migration/invasion. Clinically relevant observations are that its cytotoxic activity was also recorded in primary cells from acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. Moreover, both Hemidesmus and piperlongumine showed a selective action toward leukemic stem cell (LSC). Conclusions: Our results indicate the molecular basis of the anti-leukemic effects of Hemidesmus indicus and indentify the mitochondrial pathways, [Ca2+]i, cytodifferentiation and angiogenesis inhibition as crucial actors in its anticancer activity. The ability to selectively hit LSC showed by Hemidesmus and piperlongumine enriched the knowledge of their anti-leukemic activity. On these bases, we conclude that Hemidesmus and piperlongumine can represent a valuable strategy in the anticancer pharmacology.

Evaluation of Antitumoral activity of bone targeted drugs/conventional chemotherapies and identification of biomarkers for the selection of patients with breast cancer for the bone targeted therapy in adjuvant setting

Bone metastases are responsible for different clinical complications defined as skeletal-related events (SREs) such as pathologic fractures, spinal cord compression, hypercalcaemia, bone marrow infiltration and severe bone pain requiring palliative radiotherapy. The general aim of these three years research period was to improve the management of patients with bone metastases through two different approaches of translational research. Firstly in vitro preclinical tests were conducted on breast cancer cells and on indirect co-colture of cancer cells and osteoclasts to evaluate bone targeted therapy singly and in combination with conventional chemotherapy. The study suggests that zoledronic acid has an antitumor activity in breast cancer cell lines. Its mechanism of action involves the decrease of RAS and RHO, as in osteoclasts. Repeated treatment enhances antitumor activity compared to non-repeated treatment. Furthermore the combination Zoledronic Acid + Cisplatin induced a high antitumoral activity in the two triple-negative lines MDA-MB-231 and BRC-230. The p21, pMAPK and m-TOR pathways were regulated by this combined treatment, particularly at lower Cisplatin doses. A co-colture system to test the activity of bone-targeted molecules on monocytes-breast conditioned by breast cancer cells was also developed. Another important criticism of the treatment of breast cancer patients, is the selection of patients who will benefit of bone targeted therapy in the adjuvant setting. A retrospective case-control study on breast cancer patients to find new predictive markers of bone metastases in the primary tumors was performed. Eight markers were evaluated and TFF1 and CXCR4 were found to discriminate between patients with relapse to bone respect to patients with no evidence of disease. In particular TFF1 was the most accurate marker reaching a sensitivity of 63% and a specificity of 79%. This marker could be a useful tool for clinicians to select patients who could benefit for bone targeted therapy in adjuvant setting.